Articles

Articles

Research-backed writing for the person who owns the practice. What we measured across US clinic websites, what those findings mean, and what you can check on your own site. Not written for a marketing manager, and not for whoever built the site.

Where these stop

They stop at the diagnosis. You will finish an article knowing whether your practice has the problem it describes and how bad it looks — and you will not find instructions for repairing it, because repairing it is the work we are paid for. We would rather say that plainly than publish an article that pretends a website can be fixed by reading one.

Two other habits carry over from the rest of this site. Every figure quoted in an article is listed on our sources page with its sample and, where it is somebody else's research, a link to the original publication. And where a number came from the specimen we built, the article says so in the same breath, because a measurement of two pages we wrote ourselves is not a fact about the industry.

Start here

What machines actually receive

Decisions you are being asked to make

Where these came from

We opened 182 US clinic websites and read what each one hands to a search engine before anything on the page runs. Most of what these articles describe is what kept coming back. The findings, the two groups the sites were drawn from and the limits of all of it are set out on the clinics page, and every count is defined on the sources page.

Where an article needed a before-and-after to point at, it points at a specimen: one clinic homepage we built twice, in a practice we invented, published with the difference between the two builds measured. No real practice's website appears in this section, or anywhere else on this site.

See the specimen, both builds and the count →